.Google.com's Martin Splitt addressed a concern in the search engine optimisation Workplace Hours podcast about whether recreating YouTube video recording material in to text message on a web page will be considered replicate material and possess an adverse influence on the web page positions.Although replicate material is certainly not a damaging ranking element, web content released on a much more reliable web site can easily result in the web content on the much less authoritative site to be outranked. It is actually an authentic question to ask due to the fact that material on an authoritative will definitely outrank the exact same material on a less reliable one.Some in the search area pertain to one item of web content taking over the positions of yet another as 'cannibalization' of the website's ranking capacity. This is the concern of the individual requesting the concern.Google.com's Martin Splitt reported the sent concern:." If I generate a YouTube video clip and then take that specific text message or even web content and also place it on a websites, could Google banner that website page or internet site for reproduce information?".Various Information Media Are Managed As Different.Martin Splitt addressed that the two forms of information are actually different and will certainly not be addressed as the exact same content, thus releasing text message web content extracted coming from a video will not be thought about duplicate web content.This is his solution:." Absolutely no, one is actually an online video and also the other one is actually text content, and also would be actually one-of-a-kind information!".Posting Drew Out Text From Video Recording.Martin commended the tip of removing text content coming from a video recording as well as republishing it as text, noting that some folks like to take in web content in text message type instead of viewing a video recording. Reversing the flow of web content coming from text message to audio or even video recording is perhaps not a bad concept also due to the fact that some folks have difficulty reading text message content and might choose paying attention to it from an online video or a podcast layout.Martin discussed publishing video clip information in a textual variation:." It's also not a negative idea, some individuals (like me) may like a text version as well as others could not have the ability to make use of a video clip version of the web content in the first place due to bandwidth or even aesthetic constraints.".Takeaways.The tip behind the question is repurposing web content and it's an excellent tip. Look is actually more than Google, it's also YouTube as well as everywhere people receive their audio content, like Spotify. The reality that there is no cannibalization of the information between mediums makes repurposing a viable approach to extending your material range.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 minute score:.Featured Picture through Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.